🔗 Share this article

England's former children’s commissioner has told the Covid-19 inquiry that the administration should say sorry to children for the damaging mistakes and flawed decisions it committed during the pandemic.

'Doom Loop' Among Officials Led to Failure to Help Children

Presenting evidence to the investigation's open session, the former commissioner stated that a “doom loop” among government leaders resulted in the administration did not manage to do more to help children.

She argued that the extended restrictions and education shutdowns were responsible for the surge in psychological, welfare and behaviour difficulties still being experienced children and young people.

“The young individuals who experienced the coronavirus crisis – many of them will now be adults and others are just starting their education – are due a official sorry from the prime minister in the legislature after the inquiry has published its concluding findings,” Longfield stated.

Official Sorry Would Recognise Avoidable Mistakes and Damage Caused

“An apology would give the authorities an opportunity to publicly recognise the preventable errors and the damage that was done to many young people's wellbeing, education, physical condition, growth, and security, after choices that were taken by the administration at the time in the pandemic years.

“It would be a opportunity to say sorry, and to promise that lessons truly shall be taken on board, in case of a future health crisis or public crisis in the future.”

Children’s Interests Were Secondary to Pubs, Stores and Older People

The former commissioner stated her advice or opinions were infrequently requested by the administration throughout the pandemic, and told the inquiry that the needs of young people often “were placed after in the line to bars, retail outlets, amusement centres but also adults, throughout”.

Social Care Provision Reduced During Pandemic

Longfield was particularly disapproving of the government’s decision to drop several elements of welfare services during the pandemic, including diluting requirements for check-ins to vulnerable youngsters.

Limitations on home checks and the increasing use of virtual meetings enabled some households to avoid or conceal their home situations, Longfield suggested.

“Families, if they wanted to, could quite quickly see how they could hold the meeting in a neat, spotless area, and the rest of the house might not be the identical,” Longfield said.

Reduced standards implied social workers were not able to speak with at-risk young people without their parents present, or to consult additional relatives who might have worries.

Lack of Creative Solutions in Schools and Social Work

Longfield said she was frustrated that the government failed to use any creative problem-solving regarding schools and child protection that other parts of government, like the NHS, had employed to solve challenges.

“There was no the sort of Nightingale moment that hospitals received, in the education system. So many things could have been handled in another way concerning maintaining education access but they weren’t.

“Similarly with child welfare, [the government] moved straight to an outcome around diluting duties,” she added.

Long-Term Impacts Continue to Affect Young People

Longfield said the consequences on children and young people were ongoing, referring to the doubling in persistent absence from school, the 80% increase in support schemes issued for children with special needs, and a 300% increase in autism spectrum diagnoses in children since prior to the health crisis.

She commented the data “clearly demonstrates on the increase in virtually every indicator of [increased] risk, from pre-Covid to today”.