🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.