🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy could be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to enact a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," stated the European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity established by the family of a young person who was lost after being exposed to disturbing platform posts contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a influential peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly occurring at the state government level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to follow this lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from the West, additional nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, global agencies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

As this international conversation evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others show that states around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.