🔗 Share this article

"Half of my life is saved on this app, and suddenly they want us to pay for it."

Poor feedback and a feeling of unfairness have dominated social media conversations since the messaging service emerged as the latest technology company to put a price tag on a feature that people previously accessed for without payment.

The company behind Snapchat announced in September that it would begin imposing fees people if they have exceeding five gigabytes of saved photos and recordings stored as Snapchat Memories.

In the eyes of countless individuals, these retro posts function as a portal to bygone days – leading some to accuse the firm of "profit-driven motives" in comments on social media and poor feedback on Google and Apple's app stores.

Available Solutions

Snapchat's parent has equated its subscription options to those made available by tech giants for smartphones.

For those seeking another option for users unwilling to subscribe, subscribers may save their saved content – which for many people cover significant data – to their own hardware.

Snap indicated that only a small number of members would be impacted by the updated terms.

The company admitted that it was "never easy to shift from accessing content at no charge to paying for it" – but implied it would be "justified by the benefits" for subscribers.

Many denouncing the move online seem to disagree.

Widespread Discontent

A web-based protest dubbed the cost a "archival levy", with participants describing it "bleak" and "outrageous" – while an individual vowed to quit the app in the future.

Meanwhile, in a negative rating on the digital platform, a user named a pseudonymous user said it felt "very unethical".

"If I know millennials right, the majority have a long history of memories on the platform," they wrote. "The vast majority only kept the app mainly for this purpose. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have extensive collections of moments... Farewell Snapchat."

Furthermore, a London-based user, a 20-year-old media studies major in London, posted on the video platform her intention to remove the app.

"I concluded that I needed to download all my archived media as quickly as possible," she mentioned. "The vast majority of my teenage years have been recorded through my saved snaps, all of the pictures in there are deeply meaningful to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to demand payment users for a feature that has been free for so many years."

Unspecified Pricing

The platform has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would cost in the UK – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

But a London resident a different individual, who resides in the city, commented in a video on the social platform that she would be "upset" by such charges.

She mentioned that the service had become "a regular habit" since she began accessing it in the past.

While she said she understood the platform needed to earn income, Amber suggested that the archival function means more to users than the company may have realized.

"In my opinion it's a rather unjust decision to charge your users who have been loyal and devoted," she said. "This feature is more than a name, these are our genuine personal moments."

Expert Analysis

Firms deciding to charge from users for a function that was previously free is a common practice, and numerous people pay for options like cloud storage solutions to backup their media content from their handset.

The fact of storing data in the cloud – which certain experts in the tech industry frequently call as simply "an external server" – is that it involves expenses.

"Storing vast amounts of saved content on Snapchat requires significant resources," social media consultant Matt Navarra stated. "The company has to attempt to identify a way to cover the cost of data retention, data transfer, duplicates, file sharing, encryption – everything involved."

But the expert noted that requiring payment for a function that had once been complimentary, and subscribers had been prompted to utilize as such, may appear as a "misleading tactic" for some.

"Altering the terms after individuals have built this massive online collection doesn't really sit right," he said. And for many, he stated, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're personal mementos."

The feeling was echoed by those posting unfavorable comments, with a user describing their Snapchat photos and videos "extremely valuable to me".

"[Memories] have each part of my life within them from joyful events like births, sad moments of loss, experiences shared with close ones, [and] my complete adolescence," they commented.

Expert Analysis

A postdoctoral researcher, a research fellow at Utrecht University in the the Low Countries, stated that the platform's decision shows the consequences of business-oriented apps being used to save sentimental personal content.

"The companies profit from this trust, mutual reliance, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even encourages many people to continue using the app or persist with the feature in order to revisit their archive," she told the media. "But these are not charitable custodians of individual recollection."