🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate when and where protests can take place, with possible imprisonment for those who disobey these restrictions.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The latest limitations are being defended by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. There should be universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably can't establish limits at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to release arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the nation, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Government officials have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can propose that protests criticizing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of ongoing violence that have claimed many thousands of lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of discrimination in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been detained, mostly for carrying signs against genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, suffered and died to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how casually we allowed them to slip away.